SYNOPSIS
This book seeks to demystify the nature and the
causes of the Arab “revolutions”, better known as the
“Arab Spring” – to use the term generally used by the
“world community” (itself a euphemistic term for the
transnational elite). It is demonstrated that the ultimate
aim of the transnational elite with respect to all the
Arab “revolutions”, as well as the attempted color
revolution in Iran in 2009, has been to secure the full
integration of all the Arab regimes and Iran into the
New World Order (NWO). In other words, the world
order that was established following the collapse of
the Soviet block and the parallel universalization,
through the process of neoliberal globalization, of the
system of the internationalized market economy and
its political complement, representative ‘democracy’,
as well as its ideological complement that justifies the
need for the drastic restriction – if not abolition – of
national sovereignty, under the pretext of the
protection of human rights and the related new
doctrine of the ‘Right to Protect’.
Although the ultimate aim of the transnational elite
has been the same with regard to all the Arab
“revolutions” (and indeed the previous wars
launched by the same elite against Yugoslavia,
Afghanistan and Iraq), the means used to achieve it
have differed substantially according to the particular
country involved, despite the fact that they all
constitute, in effect, variations of the practices used
by the West in bringing about regime change in
Eastern Europe through a series of instigated “color
revolutions” over the past two decades or so.
Thus, in the case of Iran, the process of regime
change began in 2009 with an unsuccessful attempt
to instigate a color revolution, which functioned as
the precursor of the Arab “Spring”. This process may
eventually culminate in some sort of military strike
that will complement a new – and successful — color
revolution.
In the cases of Tunisia and Egypt, it was the
transnational elite itself that triggered the mass
uprisings in these countries – which were, in fact,
“waiting to happen” – at a time of its own choosing,
so that its plans could be materialized. These plans
were, on the one hand, the replacement of the failed
client regimes of Ben Ali and Mubarak respectively
with a new kind of client regime based on Islamic
“democratization”, and, on the other, the
development of armed insurrections in Libya and
Syria, and, possibly, another color revolution in Iran.
Finally, in the cases of Libya and Syria, it was the
armed insurrections pre-planned by the transnational
elite (disguised as color revolutions once again) and
backed by a direct intervention by NATO in the former
case and an indirect one (for the time being) in the
latter, which have led or are about to lead to the
replacement of the non-client regimes of Gaddafi and
Assad respectively.
The demystification of the Arab Spring is particularly
important given that its nature has been completely
distorted by the world mass media, in an
unprecedented manipulation of world public opinion
which makes the ‘media war’ launched during the Iraq
invasion seem like a dress rehearsal. This effectively
totalitarian manipulation of public opinion by the
world mass media – directly or indirectly controlled by
the transnational elite – has been seen for the first
time with respect to Libya and Syria in particular.
These mass media have almost unanimously
distorted not just the ultimate causes and real aims of
the military campaigns, but have sometimes even
engineered the very ‘facts’ leading to them – through
unidentified and sometimes even faked videos, false
reports of international NGOs (financed by the
transnational elite!) and other techniques, which have
then been used as primary sources by ‘serious’ world
media to reproduce the transnational elite’s
propaganda. Furthermore, the alternative (or social)
media which have emerged in the NWO (Facebook,
Twitter etc.) have played a crucial role in mobilizing
protesters in Arab countries and in justifying the
same campaigns of the transnational elite to the rest
of the world.
In other words, for the first time in History, there has
been an almost totalitarian control of public opinion,
since not only has the ‘silent majority’ been directly
controlled through the official media, but the active
minorities have also been indirectly controlled
through the alternative media. If we add to this the fact
that the international liberal “Left” has also, actually,
been supporting the campaigns of the transnational
elite indirectly (through its wholehearted support for
the so-called “revolutionaries” participating in the
Arab Spring), then the mass manipulation of world
public opinion becomes clear.
|
|
